<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Euthyphro’s Dilemma and the Problem of Theological Voluntarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/show/280/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/show/280</link>
	<description>The blog of the Dartmouth Apologia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtrautwein</title>
		<link>http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/show/280/comment-page-1#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>jtrautwein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/?p=280#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>If God is good, then God is the personification - so to speak - of &quot;good.&quot;  Further, if God is the &quot;Alpha and Omega,&quot; then there can be nothing external to God.  Hence, the Euthyphro Dilemma appears to present a false dichotomy of either God wills something because it is good or something is good because God wills it.  It is both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If God is good, then God is the personification &#8211; so to speak &#8211; of &#8220;good.&#8221;  Further, if God is the &#8220;Alpha and Omega,&#8221; then there can be nothing external to God.  Hence, the Euthyphro Dilemma appears to present a false dichotomy of either God wills something because it is good or something is good because God wills it.  It is both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Gonzelas</title>
		<link>http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/show/280/comment-page-1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Gonzelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/?p=280#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Interesting and a joy to read! I have added your site to my frequented sites. Keep on posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and a joy to read! I have added your site to my frequented sites. Keep on posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aletheist</title>
		<link>http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/show/280/comment-page-1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>aletheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dartmouthapologia.org/?p=280#comment-154</guid>
		<description>I take a similar approach on this issue. God&#039;s eternal and immutable nature defines what is (objectively) good, and His will flows from His nature. So there is no &quot;external&quot; standard to which God conforms, and yet His commands are not &quot;arbitary&quot; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take a similar approach on this issue. God&#8217;s eternal and immutable nature defines what is (objectively) good, and His will flows from His nature. So there is no &#8220;external&#8221; standard to which God conforms, and yet His commands are not &#8220;arbitary&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

